Inorganic Chemistry / Organometallic chemistry
Metal alkene and alkyne complexes
The Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model, metallacyclopropane character, and how coordination changes alkene reactivity.
UndergradPhDIn a nutshell
Alkenes and alkynes can bond to a metal side-on, using the electrons in their carbon–carbon π bond. The first such compound, Zeise's salt, was made in the 1820s from platinum chloride and ethanol and contains an ethene molecule clamped to platinum. In these complexes electrons flow both ways: the alkene donates its π electrons to the metal, and the metal donates electrons back into the alkene's empty antibonding orbital. That back-donation lengthens the C=C bond and bends the hydrogen atoms away from the metal, so a strongly bound alkene starts to look like a three-membered ring containing the metal. Binding to a metal also changes how an alkene reacts, making it open to attack by nucleophiles or able to insert into metal–carbon bonds. This underlies polymer production and the Wacker oxidation of ethene to ethanal.
Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson model
Two synergic components:
1. σ-donation from the filled alkene π orbital into an empty metal orbital (σ symmetry with respect to the M–alkene axis). 2. π-back-donation from a filled metal d orbital into the empty alkene π* orbital.
Both weaken the C=C bond; back-donation does so most strongly because it fills an antibonding orbital.
Two limiting structures
- Weak back-donation (electron-poor metal, e.g. Pt(II) in Zeise's salt \mathrm{K[PtCl_3(\eta^2\text{-}C_2H_4)]}): C=C only slightly lengthened (about 1.37 Å versus 1.34 Å in ethene), substituents nearly planar, alkene behaves as an L-type ligand.
- Strong back-donation (electron-rich, low-valent metal, e.g. Pt(0)(PPh_3)_2(C_2H_4)) or electron-poor alkenes such as C_2F_4 or tetracyanoethene: C–C approaches a single bond, substituents fold back from the metal (carbons tend toward sp^3), and the unit is better described as a metallacyclopropane with two M–C σ bonds and the metal formally oxidised by two.
Evidence comes from C–C bond lengths, the bend-back angle, lower \nu_{\mathrm{C=C}} and upfield ^{13}C and ^1H NMR shifts, and reduced ^1J_{\mathrm{CH}} (closer to sp^3 values) in the metallacyclopropane limit.
Alkynes
Alkynes have two orthogonal π systems. One interacts as in alkenes; the second can donate a further electron pair (π_\perp) to an electron-poor metal, so alkynes act as 2- or 4-electron donors. Coordination bends the substituents back (the C≡C–R angle can fall well below 180°), giving metallacyclopropene character. Alkynes also bridge two metals, as in \mathrm{Co_2(CO)_6(\mu\text{-}RC{\equiv}CR)}, used to protect alkynes and in the Pauson–Khand reaction.
Reactivity changes
- Nucleophilic attack: coordination to an electron-poor cationic metal (Pd(II), Pt(II), Au(I), Fe(II) in \mathrm{[CpFe(CO)_2(alkene)]^+}) reverses alkene polarity, so nucleophiles attack the coordinated alkene, usually from the face anti to the metal. In the Wacker process, water attacks Pd(II)-bound ethene, β-H elimination and tautomerisation give ethanal, and CuCl_2/O_2 reoxidise Pd(0).
- Migratory insertion: 1,2-insertion into M–H or M–C (hydrogenation, polymerisation).
- Rotation: alkene rotation about the M–alkene axis is observed by variable-temperature NMR; its barrier reflects the strength of back-donation.
- Oxidative coupling of two alkenes gives metallacyclopentanes, key in selective ethene trimerisation.
Alkene and alkyne π-complexes are intermediates in many catalytic processes, and current research focuses on controlling their activation.
π-Acid catalysis. Cationic gold(I) and platinum(II) catalysts activate alkynes and allenes toward intramolecular attack by O, N and C nucleophiles, enabling cycloisomerisations that rapidly build ring systems. Gold's strong relativistic effects make it a soft π-acid with weak back-donation, so coordinated alkynes are strongly electrophilic. Debate continues over the role of gold carbenoid versus carbocation character in rearrangements, addressed by isolation of intermediates and computation.
Selective oligomerisation. Chromium catalysts with PNP or related ligands trimerise or tetramerise ethene to 1-hexene or 1-octene through metallacycle growth, where ring size controls the product; this is now used industrially. Understanding the oxidation states (Cr(I)/Cr(III) versus Cr(II)/Cr(IV)) remains an active research question.
Asymmetric catalysis. In Rh- and Ir-catalysed asymmetric hydrogenation, alkene binding is reversible, and the major product often arises from the less stable but more reactive diastereomeric alkene complex (Curtin–Hammett control, shown by Halpern for Rh-diphosphine systems). Iron and cobalt hydrogenation catalysts aim to reproduce this with Earth-abundant metals.
Bonding analysis. Energy decomposition analysis and natural orbitals for chemical valence quantify σ-donor and π-acceptor contributions, placing complexes on the continuum between π-complex and metallacyclopropane. Strained alkenes (cyclopropenes, trans-cyclooctene) and fluoroalkenes bind tightly, which is exploited in C–F activation.
Alkyne metathesis and polymerisation. Molybdenum and tungsten alkylidyne catalysts with silanolate ligands achieve robust alkyne metathesis, used for macrocycles and conjugated materials.
Key points
- In the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson model an alkene σ-donates its π electrons and accepts metal d electrons into π*.
- Back-donation lengthens C=C and bends substituents away from the metal.
- Strong back-donation gives metallacyclopropane character; weak back-donation leaves a near-planar π-complex.
- Alkynes can donate two or four electrons and bridge two metals.
- Coordination to electron-poor metals makes alkenes susceptible to nucleophilic attack, as in the Wacker process.
Check yourself
5 questions
1In Zeise's salt, how is the ethene bound to platinum?
The ethene is \eta^2-bound, with both carbons roughly equidistant from Pt.
2Why does the C=C bond lengthen when an alkene coordinates to a metal?
Both components reduce the C–C bond order, but filling π* by back-donation has the larger effect.
3Which complex is expected to show the most metallacyclopropane character?
An electron-rich Pt(0) centre and a strongly accepting fluoroalkene give maximal back-donation.
4Why is an alkene coordinated to Pd(II) attacked by water, whereas free ethene is not?
Coordination to a cationic, weakly back-donating metal reverses the alkene's normal nucleophilic character.
5The barrier to alkene rotation about the M–alkene axis increases from one complex to another. What does this most likely indicate?
Back-donation depends on overlap between a specific d orbital and π*, so rotation disrupts it; more back-bonding means a higher barrier.
Read more
Recent preprints on this topic
- Loading…
Matched by keyword from ChemRxiv via Crossref. Not peer-reviewed; read critically.