ChemWarden Learn

Specialist and Interdisciplinary Chemistry / Medicines and chemical biology

Chemical probes and proteomics

Activity-based protein profiling, photoaffinity labelling, target identification and PROTACs.

PhD

In a nutshell

A cell contains thousands of different proteins, and a drug or toxin may stick to several of them. Chemical proteomics uses specially designed small molecules, called chemical probes, to find out which proteins a compound actually touches inside living cells and which enzymes are switched on. A typical probe has three parts: a reactive group that latches onto a protein, a connecting chain, and a handle such as biotin or a fluorescent dye. Researchers treat cells with the probe, fish out the tagged proteins and identify them by mass spectrometry. The approach helped explain how thalidomide causes harm and now underpins PROTACs, two-headed molecules that make a cell destroy a chosen protein. Degraders such as vepdegestrant, for a type of breast cancer, have reached late-stage clinical trials.

Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) uses probes whose warhead reacts covalently with a catalytic residue, so labelling reports enzyme activity, not just abundance. Fluorophosphonates label the active-site serine of serine hydrolases; epoxyketones and vinyl sulfones target proteasome and cysteine protease nucleophiles. Probes usually carry a small alkyne, and the reporter (rhodamine azide for in-gel fluorescence, biotin azide for streptavidin enrichment) is attached after lysis by CuAAC click chemistry, so the probe itself stays cell-permeable. In competitive ABPP, a drug is added first and loss of probe signal reveals its targets and off-targets across a whole enzyme family at once.

Residue-centred platforms go further. isoTOP-ABPP and its TMT-multiplexed successors use iodoacetamide-alkyne to map reactive cysteines proteome-wide, then ask which ones a library of electrophilic fragments engages. This has found ligandable cysteines on proteins once considered undruggable and supports the wider revival of covalent drugs, whose best-known clinical success is the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib.

For non-covalent ligands, photoaffinity labelling installs a diazirine or benzophenone; UV light generates a carbene or diradical that crosslinks to whatever is nearby. Minimal "fully functionalised" diazirine-alkyne tags let fragment libraries be screened directly in cells. Label-free alternatives, such as thermal proteome profiling (ligand-induced shifts in melting temperature) and limited proteolysis, avoid modifying the compound at all.

Targeted protein degradation turned target identification into a therapeutic idea. A PROTAC links a target ligand to an E3 ligase ligand (usually for cereblon or VHL), forming a ternary complex that ubiquitinates the target for proteasomal destruction; the molecule is released and acts catalytically. Too much PROTAC gives binary complexes and less degradation, the hook effect. Molecular glues such as lenalidomide reprogramme cereblon to degrade new substrates, a mechanism uncovered by proteomics. Open problems include using the hundreds of unexploited E3 ligases, rational glue discovery, oral bioavailability of large degraders and quantifying occupancy versus degradation in tissue.

Key points

  • Activity-based probes combine a reactive warhead, a linker and a reporter or click handle.
  • Competitive ABPP reveals the targets and off-targets of a drug across a whole enzyme family in native proteomes.
  • Photoaffinity labels (diazirines, benzophenones) capture non-covalent binding partners on UV irradiation.
  • Chemoproteomic cysteine profiling identifies ligandable sites for covalent drug discovery.
  • PROTACs recruit an E3 ligase to a target, causing its ubiquitination and degradation; high doses can trigger the hook effect.

Check yourself

5 questions

  1. 1What does an activity-based probe report that ordinary expression proteomics does not?

  2. 2Why is the reporter often attached by click chemistry after the cells are lysed?

  3. 3Which group is most commonly used in photoaffinity labelling to generate a carbene?

  4. 4In competitive ABPP, a drug candidate is added before the probe. A protein band disappears. What does this suggest?

  5. 5Why can degradation by a PROTAC decrease at very high PROTAC concentrations?

Read more

Recent preprints on this topic

  1. Loading…

Matched by keyword from ChemRxiv via Crossref. Not peer-reviewed; read critically.